SARIA I: The effect of rotation and organic/mineral input on Sorghum yield and soil fertility

This experiment has been added by the GLTEN Curators using existing published sources.
Objective
To evaluate the fertility of soils under different management systems.
Description
Results from Saria I indicate that under Sudano-Sahelian conditions, soil organic matter and crop performance were better maintained using organic resources with a low C/N ratio (manure) than through organic amendments with a relatively high C/N ratio (straw). Urea improved the effect of the organic amendments with high C/N ratio (straw) on crop yield and SOM concentration.
Data Access Statement
Don't know
Data license
Don't know
Data policy
Don't know
Organizations
The Agricultural Research Station of Saria
experimental research station
Institute of Environment and Agricultural Research
research organisation
People

Site: Saria I

Type
research station field
Location
Saria
Boulkiemde
Burkina Faso
Geographic location
12.274051, -2.158374
© OpenStreetMap contributors
Elevation
300 Metres
Visits permitted?
No
Soil type
lixisol
Soil description
The soil is Ferric Lixisol with very low soil organic carbon (SOC), N and available P and poor Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC). The soil is acid with a pH (H2O) between 4.09 and 5.51.
Soil properties
VariableDepthValue (range)UnitsRef yearEstimated?Baseline?
soil pH (4.09 – 5.51)
find sand content0 – 15 Centimetres (24.4 – 29) Percent2007
course sand content0 – 15 Centimetres (32 – 37) Percent2007
silt content0 – 15 Centimetres (25.7 – 28.4) Percent2007
clay content0 – 15 Centimetres (11 – 13) Percent2007
soil total carbon0 – 15 Centimetres (26.4 – 35.4) gram per kilogram2007
total soil nitrogen0 – 15 Centimetres (1.82 – 2.55) gram per kilogram2007
soil carbon to nitrogen ratio0 – 15 Centimetres (13 – 15) 2007
soil density0 – 15 Centimetres (1.69 – 1.77) gram per cubic centimetre2007

Design period: (1960—)

Design Type
Split-plot
Design description
The experiment has 6 main treatments for different fertilizer rates and sub treatments for three different rotations. Plots measure 6 x 8 m.
Number of plots
36
Number of subplots
108
Number of replicates
6
Crops
CropYears grown
sorghum
cow peas
cotton
Crop Rotations
Continuous sorghum
  • 1
    sorghum
sorghum-cow pea
  • 1
    sorghum
  • 2
    cow peas
sorghum-cotton
  • 1
    sorghum
  • 2
    cotton
Factors
Factor name
Factor levels
NPK fertilizer exposure
Low mineral fertilizer
100 kg ha-1 NPK + 50 kg ha-1 urea
High mineral fertilizer
(100 kg ha-1 of NPK + 100 kg ha-1 urea + 50 kg ha-1 of potassium chloride)
natural fertilizer exposure
Sorghum straw restitution
Chemical form: sorghum straw
biannual FYM  (5 t/ha)
Application frequency: biannually
Chemical form: farmyard manure
10 t/ha in total
biennial FYM  (40 t/ha)
Application frequency: every other year
Chemical form: farmyard manure
Factor combinations
T1
Control, no inputs added
T2
NPK fertilizer exposure: Low mineral fertilizer
natural fertilizer exposure: Sorghum straw restitution
T3
NPK fertilizer exposure: Low mineral fertilizer
natural fertilizer exposure: biannual FYM
T4
NPK fertilizer exposure: Low mineral fertilizer
T5
NPK fertilizer exposure: High mineral fertilizer
natural fertilizer exposure: biennial FYM
T6
NPK fertilizer exposure: High mineral fertilizer

Related publications