Rotation 120 – Lethbridge

This experiment has been added by the GLTEN Curators using existing published sources.
Objective
To evaluate the sustainability yields and crop fertility of common and potential crop rotations for the area.
Description
Since 1951 the experiment has been modified and renamed based on the original number of plots. The experiment names have Rotation 96, Rotation 100 (1955), Rotation 116 (1985) and Rotation 120 (2001). Soil samples have been collected at intervals throughout the experiment and are archived.
Data Access Statement
Don't know
Data license
Don't know
Data policy
Don't know
Organization
Lethbridge Research and Development Centre
research organisation
People

Site: Lethbridge

Type
research station field
Location
Lethbridge
Alberta
Canada
Geographic location
49.705, -112.775
© OpenStreetMap contributors
Visits permitted?
No
History
The plots were established on land that had been used for a mixed crop rotation with light manure applications every sixth year since being broken from native grass around 1910.
Management
Seeding rate, weed control, and field operations follow industry standard practices used by commercial growers.
Soil type
chernozem
Soil description
The soil was an Orthic Dark Brown Chernozem (Typic Haplustoll) developed on alluvial lacustrine parent material under native vegetation of tall and short grass species.
Soil properties
VariableDepthValue (range)UnitsRef yearEstimated?Baseline?
sand content 45 Percent
silt content 30 Percent
clay content 25 Percent
soil organic carbon0 – 7.5 Centimetres (15.9 – 21.7) gram per kilogram1992
soil organic carbon7.5 – 15 Centimetres (14.1 – 16.8) gram per kilogram1992

Design period: Rotation 96 and Rotation 100 (1951—1984)

Design Type
Randomized complete block design
Description
Plots measure 3.2 x 36.6 m. The rotation IF was added in 1954 when the experiment was renamed to Rotation 100 to reflect the additional plots.
Design description
The plots for the rotations were randomly assigned (with minor exceptions), using a complete randomized block design. The experiment is fully phased.
Number of plots
100
Number of replicates
4
Number of harvests per year
1
Crops
CropYears grown
wheat
fallow
crested wheatgrass
alfalfa
barley
winter wheat
feed grasses
Crop Rotations
A (W)  1951—1984
  • 1
    wheat
B (F-W)  1951—1984
  • 1
    fallow
  • 2
    wheat
C (F-W-W)  1951—1984
  • 1
    fallow
  • 2
    wheat
  • 3
    wheat
D (Fm-W-W)  1951—1984
  • 1
    fallow
    plus manure at 11.t t/ha in fall
  • 2
    wheat
  • 3
    wheat
F (F-Ww-Ww)  1951—1970
  • 1
    fallow
  • 2
    winter wheat
  • 3
    winter wheat
F (F-Ww-B)  1971—1984
  • 1
    fallow
  • 2
    winter wheat
  • 3
    barley
H (F-W-H-H-H)  1951—1984
  • 1
    fallow
  • 2
    wheat
  • 3
    wheat
  • 4
    feed grasses
    Mixture of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) and Crested wheatgrass for hay
  • 5
    feed grasses
  • 6
    -
K (F-W-G-G-G)  1951—1984
  • 1
    fallow
  • 2
    wheat
  • 3
    winter wheat
  • 4
    crested wheatgrass
  • 5
    crested wheatgrass
  • 6
    crested wheatgrass
IF (Wc+N)  1954—1984
  • 1
    wheat
    Seeded if depth of moist soil at the surface was ≥45 cm. 80 kgN/ha broadcast prior to seeding.
Measurements
VariableMaterialUnitsFrequencyScaleComment
grain yield traitNot specified
economic dataNot specified
soil organic carbonNot specifiedg/kg

Design period: Rotation 116 (1985—1994)

Description
Triple superphosphate was applied with the wheat in the seed row at 22.5 kg P ha-1.
Number of harvests per year
1
Crops
CropYears grown
wheat
fallow
lentils
native species
feed grasses
Crop Rotations
1 (W)  1985—1994
  • 1
    wheat
2 (F-W)  1985—1994
  • 1
    fallow
  • 2
    wheat
3 (F-W-W)  1985—1994
  • 1
    fallow
  • 2
    wheat
  • 3
    wheat
4 (W+N)  1985—1994
  • 1
    wheat
    Continuous wheat plus N broadcast at 80 kgN/ha
5 (F-W+N)  1985—1994
  • 1
    fallow
  • 2
    wheat
    Plus N broadcast at 80 kgN/ha
6 (F-W-W+N)  1985—1994
  • 1
    fallow
  • 2
    wheat
  • 3
    wheat
    Plus N broadcast at 80 kgN/ha
7 (L-W)  1985—1994
  • 1
    lentils
    As green manure, grain lentil until 1988.
  • 2
    wheat
8 (L-W-W)  1985—1994
  • 1
    lentils
    As green manure, grain lentil until 1988.
  • 2
    wheat
  • 3
    wheat
9 (Fm-W-W)  1985—1994
  • 1
    fallow
    Plus 11.2 t/ha manure in Fall.
  • 2
    wheat
  • 3
    wheat
10 (F-W-W-H-H-H)  1985—1994
  • 1
    fallow
  • 2
    wheat
  • 3
    wheat
  • 4
    feed grasses
    Mixture of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) and Crested wheatgrass for hay
  • 5
    feed grasses
  • 6
    feed grasses
11 (Wc)  1985—1994
  • 1
    wheat
    Seeded if depth of moist soil at the surface was ≥45 cm.
12 (Wc+N)  1985—1994
  • 1
    wheat
    Seeded if depth of moist soil at the surface was ≥45 cm. 80 kgN/ha broadcast prior to seeding.
G  1985—1994
  • 1
    native species
    Mixture of selected Agropyron spp
Factors
Factor name
Factor levels
nitrogen fertilizer exposure
Applied to selected rotations as indicated
N  (80 kgN/ha)
1985—1994
Applied to crop: wheat
Application method: broadcast application method
Chemical form: ammonium nitrate
Prior to pre-seeding tillage
farmyard manure exposure
Applied to selected rotations as indicated
M  (11.2 t/ha)
1985—1994
Measurements
VariableMaterialUnitsFrequencyScaleComment
grain yield traitNot specified
economic dataNot specified
soil organic carbonNot specifiedg/kg

Design period: Rotation 116, bioassay years (1995—2000)

Description
All plots were direct seeded to wheat each year. Triple superphosphate was applied at 20 kg P ha-1.
Design description
Plots were split in two with one half receiving nitrogen.
Crop
CropYears grown
wheat
Factor
Factor name
Factor levels
nitrogen fertilizer exposure
control exposure
1995—2000
No nitrogen applied
with N  (56 kgN/ha)
1995—2000
Application frequency: annually
Application method: broadcast application method
Chemical form: ammonium nitrate

Design period: Rotation 120 (2000—)

Crops
CropYears grown
wheat
lentils
oats
maize
native species
feed grasses
fallow
Crop Rotations
1 (F)  2001—
  • 1
    wheat
2 (F-W)  2001—
  • 1
    fallow
  • 2
    wheat
3 (F-W-W)  2001—
  • 1
    fallow
  • 2
    wheat
  • 3
    wheat
4 (W+N)  2001—
  • 1
    wheat
    Continuous wheat plus N broadcast at 45 kgN/ha
5 (F-W+N)  2001—
  • 1
    fallow
  • 2
    wheat
    Plus N broadcast at 45 kgN/ha
6 (F-W-W+N)  2001—
  • 1
    fallow
  • 2
    wheat
  • 3
    wheat
    Plus N broadcast at 45 kgN/ha
7 (Opm-W-W)  2001—
  • 1
    oats
    With field pea as forage and manure applied every second cycle (6th year).
  • 2
    wheat
  • 3
    wheat
8 (L-W-W)  2001—
  • 1
    lentils
    As green manure
  • 2
    wheat
  • 3
    wheat
9 (Fm-W-W)  2001—
  • 1
    fallow
    Plus 11.2 t/ha manure in Fall.
  • 2
    wheat
  • 3
    wheat
10 (F-W-W-H-H-H)  2001—
  • 1
    fallow
  • 2
    wheat
  • 3
    wheat
  • 4
    feed grasses
    Mixture of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) and Crested wheatgrass for hay
  • 5
    feed grasses
  • 6
    feed grasses
11 (M+N)  2001—
  • 1
    maize
    Plus 11.2 t/ha manure in Fall.
12 (H)  2001—
  • 1
    feed grasses
    Mixture of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) and Crested wheatgrass for hay
13 (G)  2001—
  • 1
    native species
    Mixture of needle-and thread, blue grama, June grass, green needle grass and western wheat grass.
Factors
Factor name
Factor levels
nitrogen fertilizer exposure
Applied to selected rotations as indicated
N  (45 kgN/ha)
2001—
Applied to crop: wheat
Application method: broadcast application method
Chemical form: ammonium nitrate
Prior to pre-seeding tillage
farmyard manure exposure
Applied to selected rotations as indicated
M  (11.2 t/ha)
2001—
Measurements
VariableMaterialUnitsFrequencyScaleComment
grain yield traitNot specified
economic dataNot specified
soil organic carbonNot specifiedg/kg

Related publications

  • Smith, E.G., Janzen, H.H., Ellert, B.H., and Nakonechny, D.J. 2012. Rotation 120 - Lethbridge, Alberta. Prairie Soils and Crops 5:155-164
  • Danny G.Le Roy, Elwin G.Smith, Phyllis J.MacCallum, and H.Henry Janzen. Will summer fallow re-emerge in the Dark Brown soil zone of the Canadian Prairie as a response to net return risk?. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 97(2): 241-249.